Guyaux v. Social Security, Commissioner of
ORDER Adopting 16 Report and Recommendation Granting 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Angelique Guyaux, Denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of, Reversing Findings of Commissioner and Remanding to Commissioner. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 13-12076
Paul D. Borman
United States District Judge
United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL HLUCHANIUK’S
JULY 15, 2014 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 16),
(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 15),
(3) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 12),
(4) REVERSING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER AND
(5) REMANDING TO THE COMMISSIONER
PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
On July 15, 2014, Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk issued a Report and
Recommendation to deny Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, grant Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, reverse the findings of the Commissioner and remand this matter to the
Commissioner for findings consistent with his Report and Recommendation, pursuant to sentence
four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation, DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTS Plaintiff’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, REVERSES the findings of the Commissioner and REMANDS to
the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Paul D. Borman
PAUL D. BORMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 22, 2014
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party
of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 22, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?