Redmond v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 16

ORDER Adopting 15 Report and Recommendation, Granting 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of, Denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Ray C Redmond. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RAY C. REDMOND, Plaintiff, Case No. 13-12758 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge v. Patricia T. Morris United States Magistrate Judge COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATRICIA T. MORRIS’S JULY 30, 2014 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 15), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 11), (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 12), (4) AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER AND (5) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE On July 30, 2014, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation to deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the findings of the Commissioner. (ECF No. 15, Report and Recommendation.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, AFFIRMS the findings of the Commissioner and DISMISSES 1 Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: August 22, 2014 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 22, 2014. s/Deborah Tofil Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?