Sinta et al v. Orlans Associates, PC et al

Filing 5

ORDER of Dismissal. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (Monda, H)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
PHILLIP SINTA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

Civil Action No. 13CV-13040

vs.

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

ORLANS ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This matter is presently before the Court on the Court’s own review of the complaint.
The Court previously dismissed a nearly identical complaint filed by the same plaintiffs last year
because the complaint was a rambling, unintelligible diatribe over which the Court had no subject
matter jurisdiction and because the Court was prohibited by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine from
granting plaintiffs’ request that the Court overturn a state court eviction order. See Sinta v.
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 12-CV-12764 (E.D. Mich.) (Order of Dismissal filed June 27, 2012).
Plaintiffs did not appeal. The complaint in the present case is nearly identical to the one dismissed
previously. Some of the defendants have changed, but just as before plaintiffs are “sovereign natural
citizens” who challenge defendants’ efforts in a Michigan state court to obtain an eviction order in
connection with mortgage foreclosure proceedings. The complaint is dismissed for the same reasons
indicated in the Court’s June 27, 2012, order of dismissal in 12-12764. If plaintiffs wish to
challenge the eviction proceedings, they must do so in the state court where those proceedings are
pending. If plaintiffs are dissatisfied with the decisions of that court, their remedy is to seek relief
within the state court system. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the complaint in this matter is dismissed.

S/ Bernard A. Friedman____________
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 25, 2013
Detroit, Michigan

2