Daneshvar v. Kipke et al
Filing
97
SCHEDULING ORDER re: 81 MOTION to Strike Expert Testimony of Eugene D. Daneshvar filed by Daryl R Kipke, Neuronexus Technologies, Inc.., ( Supplemental statement of compliance due by 11/12/2015)--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
EUGENE D. DANESHVAR,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:13-cv-13096
Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti
DARYL R. KIPKE and
NEURONEXUS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.
_________________________/
SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING
DEFENDANTS’ SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT
TESTIMONY OF EUGENE D. DANESHVAR (DE 81)
Currently before the Court is Defendants’ September 30, 2015 motion to
strike expert testimony of Eugene D. Daneshvar, regarding which a response and a
reply have been filed. (DEs 81, 82, 90 and 95.) Judge Murphy has referred this
motion to me for hearing and determination. (DE 93.)
Previously, on October 15, 2015, I conducted a hearing on two discovery
motions (DEs 52 and 77), at which time I discussed the importance of compliance
with E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a) (“Seeking Concurrence in Motions and Requests.”).
Looking at the instant motion, there is no statement of compliance with E.D. Mich.
LR 7.1. (See DE 81 at 1-3.)
Of course the instant September 30, 2015 motion (DE 81) was filed in
advance of the Court’s October 15, 2015 warning. Still, while the Court will not
deny or strike the instant motion solely on the basis of a failure to comply with
E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a), the Court will also not consider it or set it for hearing until it
receives a supplemental statement of compliance with Local Rule 7.1(a). If the
Court does not receive such certification within fourteen (14) days of the date of
this order, the instant motion will be stricken or denied on the basis that it does not
comply with E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 28, 2015
s/ Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on October 28, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?