Tate v. Unum Group et al

Filing 18

FINAL ORDER Rescheduling Status Conference - ( TELEPHONIC Status Conference set for 2/27/2014 11:00 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LARRY TATE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 13-13389 UNUM GROUP ET AL., Defendants. / FINAL ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE In Plaintiff’s November 13, 2013 “Motion to Allow Late Filing . . .,” Plaintiff’s counsel informed the court of his severe medical issues, which were impacting his ability to timely file a response briefing. A few weeks later, the court’s staff was notified that his issues were ongoing. The court scheduled a telephone conference to occur on December 19, 2013. Due to his medical condition, Plaintiff’s counsel was not available for the call, so the court postponed it for thirty days. Once again, however, Plaintiff’s counsel is unable to participate in the call. The court is cognizant of his medical difficulties, but the case cannot linger indefinitely on this court’s docket. The court will reschedule the telephone conference for another thirty days. If counsel is not able to participate at that time, the court will issue an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See E.D. Mich. LR 41.2. If counsel is unable to continue in this matter, Plaintiff simply needs to find a different attorney. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the January 23, 2014 telephone conference is RESCHEDULED for February 27, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: January 23, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, January 23, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\CHD\Orders and Opinions\13-13989.TATE.ShowCause.Prosecution.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?