Stornello et al v. Heyns

Filing 30

ORDER Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation denying 15 Motion to Amend/Correct and denying 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Angelo Stornello Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (CMul)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ANGELO STORNELLO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
vs.

Civil Action No. 13-CV-13674
HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

DANIEL HEYNS,
Defendant.
__________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS
FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
This matter is presently before the Court on plaintiffs’ motions for a preliminary
injunction [docket entry 8] and to amend the complaint [docket entry 15]. Magistrate Judge Laurie
J. Michelson has submitted a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which she recommends that
both motions be denied. While plaintiffs have filed timely objections to the R&R, but they have not
shown any error in the magistrate judge’s analysis or conclusions. In particular, plaintiffs have not
shown they are likely to succeed on the merits or that they will suffer irreparable harm unless the
Court issues a preliminary injunction. Nor did plaintiffs attach a proposed amended complaint to
their motion for leave to amend. Therefore, the magistrate judge correctly recommended that both
motions be denied.
The Court has reviewed the complaint, the motion papers and the R&R and agrees
with the magistrate judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Michelson’s R&R is hereby accepted and
adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction
[docket entry 8] is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint [docket
entry 15] is denied without prejudice.

Dated: December 27, 2013
Detroit, Michgian

S/ Bernard A. Friedman
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2