McCray v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER denying 8 defendant's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LAUDREY McCRAY, Plaintiff, Case No. 13-CV-13850 vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH HILTON WORLDWIDE, INC., Defendant. _____________________________/ ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO THE DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS [DOC. 8] Plaintiff, Laudrey McCray, filed this negligence and breach of contract action arising out of a burn injury that allegedly occurred when he was staying at Hilton Yaoundé, in the Republic of Cameroon. Plaintiff claims that he was burned while utilizing the steam room at the hotel when an unmarked steam outlet discharged steam directly onto his right leg. Plaintiff is a resident and domiciliary of Florida. Defendant, Hilton Worldwide, Inc. (“Hilton”), is a Virginia corporation which manages, but does not own, the Hilton Yaoundé. The Hilton Yaoundé appears to be owned by Cameroon Hotels Corporation (“CHC”), a Cameroonian entity which is not a named party to this lawsuit. The matter is presently before the court on Hilton’s motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens. The court heard oral argument by the parties on February 3, 2014. Now, therefore, for the reasons stated on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that discovery in this matter shall commence immediately. It is so ordered. Dated: February 3, 2014 S/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on February 3, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Marcia Beauchemin Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?