Finkbeiner v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (KDoa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KRIS R. FINKBEINER, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 13-13906 HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Plaintiff Kris Finkbeiner brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. The matter was remanded pursuant to Sentence Six for further proceedings, and the Court retained jurisdiction over the action. The post-remand agency proceedings have been completed, and the results have been filed with the Court. Therefore, on April 29, 2019, Defendants moved for entry of judgment (ECF No. 37). In a Report and Recommendation dated June 11, 2019, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub recommended the motion be granted. Notably, after the administrative law judge conducted further proceedings, he found that Plaintiff was not disabled within the meaning the Social Security Act. (Tr. 647-80). As noted in the Report and Recommendation, Defendant incorrectly characterized the decision as fully favorable and that Plaintiff was disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. (See ECF No. 39 n.3). The mischarterization is immaterial to the resolution of the motion. Because the time to file exceptions has expired, and no party has filed a response to the motion, the Court ADOPTS MAGISTRATE JUDGE MONA K. MAJZOUB’S REPORT AND RECOMMENATION AND GRANTS the motion to enter judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: August 14, 2019 s/Marianne O. Battani MARIANNE O. BATTANI United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?