DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Filing
104
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule and Closing Argument as to 61 MOTION for Protective Order Establishing Parameters for Defendant to Conduct Interviews and Discovery of Incarcerated and Putative Class Member and Non-Party Witnesses :( Plaintiffs' brief due by 7/9/2014, Defendants' response due by 7/16/2014, Closing Arguments set for 7/23/2014 02:00 PM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOHN DOE 1, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 13-14356
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CLOSING ARGUMENTS
On June 5, 2014, at the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing regarding Plaintiffs’
motion for a protective order, the parties requested an opportunity to review the transcripts
of the hearing in order to prepare closing briefs. The transcripts have now been published
to the docket, and the parties have had a reasonable opportunity to review them.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs will file a brief of no more than ten pages
summarizing their arguments in favor of granting their motion for a protective order by July
9, 2014. Defendants will file a response brief of no more than ten pages by July 16,
2014.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will appear at 2:00 p.m. on July 23,
2014, for closing arguments on Plaintiffs’ motion.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: June 27, 2014
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on
this date, June 27, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\13-14356.DOE.OrderSettingBriefingClosingArgMotProtectiveOrder.jac.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?