DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al

Filing 54

ORDER granting 49 Defendants' Motion for Status Conference and Setting Status Conference for 3/13/2014 at 9:30 am and Directing Counsel for each side to appoint one lead counsel prepared to represent their respective position.. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 13-14356 v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE On March 4, 2014, Defendants moved for a status conference following a breakdown in negotiations over an agreement between the parties on parameters for conducting interviews with putative class members, as well as for a protective order in the case. The court agrees that a status conference is necessary, in part to determine the parties’ reactions to the court holding an evidentiary hearing to decide these issues. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ “Motion for Status Conference” [Dkt. # 49] is GRANTED. The court will hold a telephonic status conference with the parties on March 13, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. Although all counsel for both Plaintiffs and Defendants are welcome to listen on the call, the court DIRECTS each side to appoint one lead counsel prepared to represent his or her respective position. The court will initiate the call. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 10, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, March 10, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\13-14356.DOE.OrderSettingStatusConf.jac.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?