DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al

Filing 55

ORDER Setting Motions Deadline - Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order to be filed by 4/28/2014, Defendants' response due by 4/4/2014, Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement due by 2/28/2014 and Plaintiffs' response due by 4/4/2014. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 13-14356 v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. / ORDER SETTING MOTION DEADLINES Following a motion by Defendants, the court held an off-the-record telephonic status conference with counsel for the parties on March 13, 2014. The court discussed with the parties their inability to reach an agreement on: (1) proposed parameters for interviewing putative class members and prisoner witnesses; (2) a proposed protective order sealing Plaintiffs’ identities; and (3) a Rule 26(f) plan that has yet to be submitted. The court noted that the parties seem to be unable to come to an agreement on all three points, and that motion practice will be necessary in order to move the case forward. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs will file a motion for a protective order regarding parameters for interviewing putative class members and prisoner witnesses by March 28, 2014. Defendants’ response is due by April 4, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants will file a motion for a more definite statement by March 28, 2014. Plaintiffs’ response is due by April 4, 2014. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 14, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, March 14, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\13-14356.DOE.OrderMotDeadlines.jac.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?