DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al

Filing 73

ORDER denying 57 Motion to Compel and PROTECTIVE ORDER Governing Exhibit F to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DOE 1 et al., Plaintiff, Case No. 13-14356 v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al., Defendant. / ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL TO RETURN ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING “EXHIBIT F” TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT On March 25, 2014, Defendants filed a “Motion to Compel Plaintiffs’ Counsel to Return Attorney Work Product Inadvertently Produced.” The court held a telephonic hearing on this motion on April 10, 2014. For the reasons more fully stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ “Motion to Compel Plaintiffs’ Counsel to Return Attorney Work Product Inadvertently Produced” [Dkt. # 57] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this protective order governs the unredacted affidavits filed as “Exhibit F” to Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 47]. Defendants shall provide Plaintiffs’ counsel with unredacted copies of the affidavits that constitute “Exhibit F,” but Plaintiff’s counsel shall not distribute copies of the affidavits, or disclose the identities of the affiants contained in those affidavits, to anyone, including their clients, without or until further order of the court. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: April 18, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, April 18, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?