DOE 1 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
Filing
90
ORDER Setting Evidentiary Hearing, Suspending Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Directing Counsel to Cease Filing Motions until such time the court issues a scheduling order., ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 6/4/2014 08:30 AM before District Judge Robert H. Cleland) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOHN DOE 1, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 13-14356
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY HEARING
On May 21, 2014, the court held an on-the-record telephone conference with the
parties to discuss holding an evidentiary hearing for Plaintiffs’ pending motion for a
protective order. After consulting with the parties,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to appear for an evidentiary
hearing on Plaintiffs’ “Motion for a Protective Order” (Dkt. # 61) on June 4 and 5, 2014
at 8:30 a.m. Prior to the hearing, the court anticipates that the parties will agree on a
date to exchange witness lists.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that briefing on Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss
Counts II and III of Plaintiffs’ Complaint” (Dkt. # 87) is SUSPENDED until further order
of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, absent unforeseen exigency, the parties are
DIRECTED to cease filing motions with the court until such time as the court issues a
scheduling order governing this case.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 27, 2014
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, May 27, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\13-14356.DOE.OrderSettingEvidentiaryHearing.jac.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?