Stamm v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
13
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#12] DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#10], AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#11] Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (Bankston, T)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JEANETTE STAMM,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 13-cv-14422
Honorable Gershwin A. Drain
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
/
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#12].
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#10], AND
GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#11]
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment as
to Plaintiff Jeanette Stamm’s claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of Social
Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to
Magistrate Judge David R. Grand, who issued a Report and Recommendation on September 16,
2014, recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, grant
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the Commissioner’s findings. Neither
party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the time
for filing objections has expired. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon review of the parties’ briefing and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion.
Therefore, the Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Grand’s September 16,
2014 Report and Recommendation [#12] as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
-1-
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [#11] is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment [#10] is DENIED.
This cause of action is dismissed.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 7, 2014
/s/Gershwin A Drain
Hon. Gershwin A. Drain
United States District Court Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?