Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters v. Smith et al
Filing
59
NOTICE OF HEARING on Plaintiff's 57 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Glenn Smith and ORDER to Appear for Status Conference. (Motion Hearing and Status Conference set for 3/8/2017 at 2:00 PM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman.) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHIGAN REGIONAL COUNCIL
OF CARPENTERS,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 13-cv-14566
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
GLENN SMITH, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________________________________________________/
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO GLENN SMITH (ECF #57)
AND ORDER TO APPEAR FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
On January 12, 2017, counsel for Plaintiff filed a Motion for Default Judgment
as to Glen Smith. (See ECF #57).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for all parties shall appear at the
United States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette
Blvd., Courtroom 237, Detroit, Michigan, on Thursday, March 8, 2017 at 2:00
p.m. for a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Notice
and a copy of the proposed judgment on Defendant Glenn Smith no later than March
1, 2017. Plaintiff shall also file a Certificate of Service with the Court no later than
March 3, 2017.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at the conclusion of the motion hearing,
the Court will conduct a status conference in this action with counsel for the
remaining parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: February 15, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on February 15, 2017, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(313) 234-5113
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?