Roberts v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
25
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 24 Report and Recommendation, 17 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Ronald C. Roberts, 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RONALD C. ROBERTS,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 13-14675
Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff
-vCAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
___________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff filed the instant action seeking Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social
Security Act. This matter is currently before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R.
Grand’s Report and Recommendation of January 8, 2015 (Docket #24), wherein the
Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in
part, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, and the case be remanded to
Defendant for further review and consideration by the Administrative Law Judge. The Court
has been advised neither party will file any objections to the Report and Recommendation.
After a thorough review of the court file, the parties’ respective motions and the
Report and Recommendation, this Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation and
enter it as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART. In addition, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),
the Court hereby REMANDS this matter to Defendant for further review and consideration
in accord with the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 14, 2015
S/Lawrence P. Zatkoff
LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?