Roberts v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
30
ORDER Adopting 29 Report and Recommendation for Granting 27 Petition for Attorney Fees, filed by Ronald C. Roberts. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Ronald C. Roberts,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 13-14675
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
Honorable Sean F. Cox
Defendant.
______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
6/10/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On April 14, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney fees in this matter. That motion
was referred to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand for a Report and Recommendation.
On June 10, 2015, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a Report and Recommendation
(Docket Entry No. 29) wherein he recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees be
granted and that Plaintiff “be awarded EAJA fees in the total amount of $4,452.64.”
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a
matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after
being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall
make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the
magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id.
The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither
party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the June 10, 2015 R&R.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees is GRANTED and
that Plaintiff Ronald C. Roberts is AWARDED EAJA fees in the total amount of $4,452.64.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: July 2, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July
2, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Jennifer McCoy
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?