Pouncy v. Palmer

Filing 198

ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Petitioner's 158 Emergency Motion for Bond Pending Resolution of Habeas Claims and Based on Actual Innocence. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION OMAR RASHAD POUNCY, Petitioner, Case No. 13-cv-14695 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. CARMEN D. PALMER, Respondent. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR BOND PENDING RESOLUTION OF HABEAS CLAIMS AND BASED ON ACTUAL INNOCENCE (ECF #158) Currently before the Court is Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy’s Emergency Motion for Bond Pending Resolution of Habeas Claims and Based on Actual Innocence. (See ECF #158). The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court is unwilling to grant Pouncy bond at this time and in the current procedural posture of the case. The Court is in the process of reviewing Pouncy’s claim of actual innocence – post-hearing briefing on that issue is in process – and the Court will not release Pouncy on bond during that review. If the Court resolves Pouncy’s actual innocence claim in his favor or otherwise rules in his favor of the merits of any claim in his habeas petition, Pouncy may renew his motion for bond at that time. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 7, 2018 1 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on September 7, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?