Pouncy v. Palmer

Filing 268

ORDER Denying Petitioner's 231 Renewed Motion for Respondent to Show Cause Regarding Interference With Attorney-Client Communications. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
OMAR RASHAD POUNCY,
Petitioner,
Case No. 13-cv-14695
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman

v.
CARMEN D. PALMER,

Respondent.
__________________________________________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S RENEWED MOTION FOR
RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING INTERFERENCE WITH
ATTORNEY–CLIENT COMMUNICATION (ECF No. 231)
On May 3, 2019, Petitioner Omar Pouncy filed a renewed Motion for
Respondent to Show Cause Regarding Interference with Attorney–Client
Communication (ECF No. 231). For the reasons explained on the record on October
16, 2019 (in the context of a discussion of a related motion that raised the same or
similar issues), the Court is not yet persuaded to grant Petitioner’s requested relief.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Petitioner’s Motion is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 17, 2019

s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on October 17, 2019, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
[phone]

2