Matje v. Zestos et al

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING 15 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION THOMAS L. MATJE, Plaintiff, No. 13-14791 v. District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen MR. ZESTOS, Medical Director, ET AL., Defendants. / ORDER On November 20, 2013, Plaintiff Thomas L. Matje, an inmate in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, filed a pro se civil complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). On April 2, 2014, he filed the present Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [Doc. #15]. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), a plaintiff may amend the complaint once as of right before a responsive pleading has been filed. In this case, some Defendants have returned waivers of service and some have not yet been served, but no responsive pleadings have yet been filed. Thus, Plaintiff’s motion is unnecessary. However, I understand that he is proceeding pro se, so for clarity’s sake, his motion [Doc. #15] is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, which may include his proposed request for injunctive relief, within 30 days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 10, 2014 S/R. Steven Whalen R. STEVEN WHALEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on April 10, 2014, electroinically and/or by U.S. mail. s/Michael Williams Case Manager forthe Honorbale R. Steven Whalen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?