Williams v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 20

ORDER granting 18 plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEBORAH J. WILLIAMS, CASE NO. 13-CV-14941 HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. / ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES (DOC. # 18) Now before the court is plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees in this Social Security case (Doc. #18). On March 20, 2015, the court accepted Magistrate Judge Mona Majzoub’s report and recommendation, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and remanded the action to the Commissioner of Social Security for proper application of the treating-physician rule (Doc. #16). Plaintiff subsequently filed the instant motion for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees in the sum of $3,040.62, payable directly to plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to an assignment of fees in her fee arrangement with her attorney. Alternatively, if defendant verifies that plaintiff owes a debt to the United States, plaintiff moves the court to order defendant to offset the debt and issue the remaining balance to plaintiff in her name. Defendant filed a response -1- stating that it does not object to plaintiff’s motion. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 12, 2015 s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on May 12, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Marcia Beauchemin Deputy Clerk -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?