White v. Jindal et al

Filing 260

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS FOR FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, et al (Doc. 252) EMERGENCY INJUNCTION (Doc. 257) AND TO SUPPLEMENT (Doc. 259) AND STAYING FURTHER MOTIONS UNTIL PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ARE RESOLVED. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (MVer)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARK WHITE,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 13-15073

PAUL KLEE, LEE McROBERT, and
LOUIS CONDON,

HON. AVERN COHN

Defendants.
____________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR
“FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, et al” (Doc. 252)
“EMERGENCY INJUNCTION” (Doc. 257)
AND
“TO SUPPLEMENT” (Doc. 259)
AND
STAYING FURTHER MOTIONS UNTIL PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT ARE RESOLVED
This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding
pro se and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial
proceedings. (Doc. 12). Following motion practice and several reports and
recommendations which were adopted by the Court, plaintiff’s remaining claims relate to
his refusal to “snitch” on fellow inmates and the alleged failure of Paul Klee, the Warden
at the Gus Harrison Facility, Lee McRobert, the Deputy Warden, and Louis Condon, a
Resident Unit Manager (“defendants”) to properly protect him from gang members. In
other words, plaintiff is asserting a First Amendment retaliation claim.
After the magistrate judge certified that the pretrial proceedings were completed,
(Doc. 201), the parties were permitted to file cross motions for summary judgment

directed at the merits of plaintiff’s claims. (Docs. 239, 243). The motions are now fully
briefed and are awaiting decision by the undersigned.
Meanwhile, plaintiff has filed several motions, including a “Motion for Injunctive
Relief and for Telephonic Hearing for Fines, Fees, for Contempt...” (Doc. 252), a
“Motion for Emergency Injunction,” (Doc. 257), and a “Motion to Add Supplemental
Information to Emergency Injunction.” (Doc. 259).
The motions are DENIED.
Further, no further motions shall be filed until after the Court rules on the pending
summary judgment motions.
SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn
AVERN COHN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: 9/5/2019
Detroit, Michigan

2