Annabel v. Frost et al
Filing
144
ORDER denying 110 Motion for TRO; adopting 128 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT ANNABEL,
Case No. 14-10244
Plaintiff,
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW
v.
JACK FROST, ET AL.,
MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN
WHALEN
Defendants.
/
ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [128]; OVERRULING
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION [132]; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR
TRO [110]
On July 28, 2017, Plaintiff Robert Annabel filed a Renewed Motion for
TRO and Preliminary Injunction [110]. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) [128] recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s
Renewed Motion. Plaintiff filed an Objection [132] to the R&R on September 28,
2017.
The Court has reviewed the Renewed Motion, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R,
and the Plaintiff’s Objection. The Objection states: “Plaintiff incorporates ALL his
prior objections.” [Dkt. #132]. The Court addressed Plaintiff’s prior objections in
Order [130], filed on September 20, 2017. The Court incorporates its analysis in
Order [130].
1
The R&R [128] is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Objection [132] is OVERRULED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for TRO
and Preliminary Injunction [110] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 23, 2017
s/Arthur J. Tarnow
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?