Annabel v. Frost et al

Filing 144

ORDER denying 110 Motion for TRO; adopting 128 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT ANNABEL, Case No. 14-10244 Plaintiff, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW v. JACK FROST, ET AL., MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN Defendants. / ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [128]; OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION [132]; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR TRO [110] On July 28, 2017, Plaintiff Robert Annabel filed a Renewed Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction [110]. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [128] recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion. Plaintiff filed an Objection [132] to the R&R on September 28, 2017. The Court has reviewed the Renewed Motion, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, and the Plaintiff’s Objection. The Objection states: “Plaintiff incorporates ALL his prior objections.” [Dkt. #132]. The Court addressed Plaintiff’s prior objections in Order [130], filed on September 20, 2017. The Court incorporates its analysis in Order [130]. 1 The R&R [128] is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Objection [132] is OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for TRO and Preliminary Injunction [110] is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 23, 2017 s/Arthur J. Tarnow Arthur J. Tarnow Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?