Daniel v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al

Filing 21

ORDER denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROCHELLE DANIEL,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 14-11117

v.
EQUABLE ASCENT FINANCIAL, LLC, and
VELOCITY PORTFOLIO GROUP,
Defendants.
/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of the court’s order denying her motion for
default judgment. (Dkt. # 14.) Plaintiff repeats her argument that Defendants should
have submitted a stipulated order extending the time to answer Plaintiff’s complaint
sooner than they did. The court repeats its answer: “It was reasonable for Defendants
to rely on [Plaintiff’s] oral agreement, and file the stipulated order after the intervening
weekend.” (Dkt. # 18, Pg. ID 50.) Further, “[i]t is unwise to unreasonably and
unnecessarily multiply the proceedings.” (Id. at Pg ID 51.) Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 19) is DENIED.

s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 22, 2014

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, August 22, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
[phone]

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\14-1117.DANIEL.OrderDenyReconsider.jac.wpd

2