Sedlak et al v. Holder et al
Filing
33
ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 27 Report and Recommendation and Denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROGER SEDLAK,
Plaintiff,
vs.
No. 14-CV-11610-DT
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
ERIC HOLDER, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on August 24, 2015
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
United States District Chief Judge
This federal prisoner’s Bivens action having come before the Court on the July 16,
2015 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen
recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment as to
Defendants Terris, True, Stoner, Call and Beck; and no timely objections to the R & R
having been filed; and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation and the Court’s file of this action and having concluded that, for the
reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default
Judgment should be denied; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s
Report and Recommendation of July 15, 2015 [Dkt. # 27] be, and hereby is, adopted by
this Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. #
14] hereby is, DENIED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: August 25, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or
counsel of record on August 25, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Julie Owens
Case Manager, (313) 234-5135
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?