Sedlak et al v. Holder et al

Filing 33

ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 27 Report and Recommendation and Denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (JOwe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROGER SEDLAK, Plaintiff, vs. No. 14-CV-11610-DT Hon. Gerald E. Rosen ERIC HOLDER, et al., Defendants. ___________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on August 24, 2015 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge This federal prisoner’s Bivens action having come before the Court on the July 16, 2015 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment as to Defendants Terris, True, Stoner, Call and Beck; and no timely objections to the R & R having been filed; and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and the Court’s file of this action and having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment should be denied; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of July 15, 2015 [Dkt. # 27] be, and hereby is, adopted by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment [Dkt. # 14] hereby is, DENIED. s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: August 25, 2015 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on August 25, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5135

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?