Lee v. Li

Filing 40

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT EDWARD LEE,
Plaintiff,

No. 14-11722

v.

District Judge Matthew F. Leitman
Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

SAI LI, ET AL.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Lee’s self-styled and rambling Motion to Show
Cause, Amended Supplemental Pleadings, and Request for Marshals to Serve CoDefendants [Doc. #39].
Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I will liberally construe this motion as (1) a
request for Marshal’s service, and (2) a response to Defendant Sai Li’s motion for
judgment on the pleadings [Doc. #32]. There is no basis to issue an order to show cause
to anyone.
Defendant Eli Lilly Corporate Center has been dismissed. Sai Li is the only
remaining Defendant. He has been served, and has filed a dispositive motion. There are
no Defendants to be served; therefore, the motion for Marshal’s service [Doc. #32] is
DENIED.
Plaintiff’s motion will nevertheless be considered in assessing Defendant’s motion
for judgment on the pleadings.

-1-

IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/R. Steven Whalen
R. STEVEN WHALEN
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: November 6, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on
November 6, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.
s/C. Ciesla
Case Manager

-2-