Dudley El v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al

Filing 85

ORDER Adopting 80 Report and Recommendation and 81 Report and Recommendation. Dan Bolden, Evertt Elkins, G S Gray, Donald Makowski, Carl Maynard, Kenneth L McGinnis, Leland Putnam, Jack Beeson and Gene Bogert dismissed. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DARRYL DUDLEY EL,
Case No. 14-11927
Plaintiff,
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ARTHUR J. TARNOW

v.
DONALD MAKOWSKI, ET AL.,

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STEPHANIE DAWKINS DAVIS

Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS [80, 81]; DISMISSING
DEFENDANTS DAN BOLDEN, DONALD MAKOWSKI, LELAND PUTNAM, CARL
MAYNARD, JACK BEESON, G.S. GRAY, EVERTT ELKINS, GENE BOGERT, AND
KENNETH MCGINNIS
Plaintiff Darryl Dudley El, a pro se prisoner, has brought claims against the
Michigan Department of Corrections (hereinafter “MDOC”) and MDOC officials,
alleging violations of his 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendment rights, pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983. On May 26, 2017 and June 1, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued
Reports and Recommendations (R&R) [Dkt. #80, 81] advising the Court to dismiss
Defendants Dan Bolden, Donald Makowski, Leland Putnam, Carl Maynard, Jack
Beeson, G.S. Gray, Evertt Elkins, Gene Bogert, and Kenneth McGinnis. Neither
party filed Objections to either R&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

Page 1 of 2

The Court having reviewed the record, both Reports and Recommendations
[80, 81] are hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the
Court. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Dan Bolden, Donald Makowski, Leland
Putnam, Carl Maynard, Jack Beeson, G.S. Gray, Evertt Elkins, Gene Bogert, and
Kenneth McGinnis are DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 28, 2017

s/Arthur J. Tarnow
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge

Page 2 of 2