Williams v. Burton
Filing
10
ORDER Setting Hearing on Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 7 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing: (Motion Hearing set for 3/30/2016 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. **PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION**) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JARRHOD S. WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
Case No. 14-12341
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
DEWAYNE BURTON,
Respondent.
_________________________________/
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PETITIONER’S PETITION
FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [ECF #1] AND
MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING [ECF #7]
On June 14, 2014, counsel for Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus [ECF #1] and on April 30, 2015, filed a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing
[ECF #7].
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for the parties shall appear at the
United States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette
Blvd., Courtroom 242, Detroit, Michigan, on Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at
10:00 a.m. for a hearing on petitioner’s petition and motion.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties be prepared to
argue (1) the claims in the Petition for Habeas Corpus, and (2) Petitioner’s Motion
for Evidentiary Hearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties be prepared to
discuss Petitioner’s filings with the Michigan Court of Appeals, the decision issued
by the Michigan Court of Appeals, and the decision of the state trial court denying
petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: March 15, 2016
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on March 15, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary
mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(313) 234-5113
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?