Brooks v. Bergh

Filing 13

ORDER denying 12 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (CBet)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EDWIN DEWAYNE BROOKS Petitioner, v. Case No. 14-12576 Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds DAVID BERGH, Respondent. _____________________________________/ ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY On July 17, 2014, this Court denied Petitioner's application of for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is now before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for a certificate of appealability [9] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The court may issue a certificate of appealability if the petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). [T]he petitioner need not show that he should prevail on the merits. He has already failed in that endeavor. Rather, he must demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues [in a different manner] or that the questions are "adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n. 4 (1983); Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547, 549 (E.D. Mich. 1999). For the reasons stated in the Court’s Opinion and Order denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus [7], this Court reiterates its finding that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right with respect to any of his claims. Being further advised in the premises and having read the pleadings, the Court hereby DENIES Petitioner’s motion for a certificate of appealability. SO ORDERED. S/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: August 20, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on August 20, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Carol J. Bethel Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?