Weatherspoon v. Dinsa et al

Filing 47

ORDER DENYING Motions 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 . Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (AChu)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MORRIS WEATHERSPOON, #471817, CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-12756 Plaintiff, DISTRICT JUDGE LAURIE J. MICHELSON v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN SURJIT DINSA, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER Plaintiff Morris Weatherspoon, who is proceeding pro se in this prisoner civil rights case, has filed the following motions: -Motion to dismiss Defendant Potts’ summary judgment motion [Doc. #26]. -Motion to dismiss Defendant McGuire’s summary judgment motion [Doc. #27]. -Motion to dismiss Defendant Kornowski’s summary judgment motion [Doc. #28]. -Motion to Dismiss Defendant Dinsa’ summary judgment motion [Doc. #29]. -Motion to Dismiss Defendant Conrad’s summary judgment motion [Doc. #30]. -Motion to Deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss on grounds of qualified immunity [Doc. #31]. While characterized as “motions to dismiss motions,” Plaintiff’s filings are, in effect, responses to the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment [Doc. #18 and #21]. I construed them as such, and fully considered the arguments contained therein in -1- preparing my Report and Recommendation to grant the Defendants’ motions. However, to the extent that the Plaintiff’s motions [Doc. #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, and #31] request that the Defendants’ summary judgment motions be dismissed or stricken, they are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/R. Steven Whalen R. STEVEN WHALEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: August 4, 2015 Certificate of Service I certify that a copy of this document was served upon parties of record on August 4, 2015 via electronic or postal mail. /s/A. Chubb CASE MANAGER -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?