Weatherspoon v. LNU et al

Filing 129

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 128 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to the Magistrate Judge's 127 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (Objections to Report & Recommendation due by 9/6/2016.) Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MORRIS WEATHERSPOON, Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-12789 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. GEORGE LNU, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #128) On July 19, 2016, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”) recommending that the Court grant summary judgment in favor of Defendants Susan George and Tamara Scheppelman. (See ECF #127.) On July 29, 2016, Plaintiff Morris Weatherspoon (“Weatherspoon”) filed a Motion requesting a 30-day extension of time from August 5, 2016 to file objections to the R&R (the “Motion”). (See ECF #128.) The Court believes Weatherspoon’s request to be appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: Weatherspoon shall file any objections that he may have to the R&R by Tuesday, September 6, 2016.1 s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: August 9, 2016 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on August 9, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (313) 234-5113                                                              1 30 days from August 4, 2016 is September 4, 2016 – a Sunday. Monday, September 5, 2016, is Labor Day. The Court therefore grants Weatherspoon a 32day extension to file any objections he may have to the Report and Recommendation.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?