Magee v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 23

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for Granting 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of, Denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by ROBIN MAGEE re 22 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

Robin Magee,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 14-13587

Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,

Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendant.
______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
1/21/16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
In this action, Plaintiff Robin Magee appeals a final decision of the Commissioner
denying her application for Supplemental Security Income under the Social Security Act.
The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Stafford for determination of all
non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation
pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C).
Thereafter, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) issued on January 21, 2016, Magistrate Stafford recommends that: 1)
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED; and 2) the Commissioner’s Motion for
Summary be GRANTED, and that the Commissioner’s decision be AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a
matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after
being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall

1

make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the
magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id.
The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither
party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the January 21, 2016 R&R.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is
DENIED; and 2) the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary is GRANTED, and that the
Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: February 8, 2016
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on
February 8, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Jennifer McCoy
Case Manager

2