Powell v. First Allied Securities, Inc et al
Filing
29
ORDER Noting Need for Response to Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
______________________________________________________________________________
WILLIAM E. POWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 14-13589
FIRST ALLIED SECURITIES, INC.,
Defendant.
______________________________________/
ORDER NOTING NEED FOR RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
This matter is before the court, on its own motion, relative to a Motion to Dismiss filed
by the Defendant on or about March 3, 2015. The motion was followed soon thereafter by an
“objection” filed by Plaintiff, proceeding pro se.
The court observes, first, that an “objection” is not a response to a motion. Second, that
the Local Rules provide for a period of twenty-one days to respond to a dispositive motion such
as a motion to dismiss. E. D. Mich. LR 7.1e (1)(A), (B). And finally, that a colorable motion
that stands with no opposition is very likely to be granted.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: March 17, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, March 17, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\Lisa's Folder\14-13589 Order Noting Need For Resonse to Motion to Dismiss.docx
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?