Powell v. First Allied Securities, Inc et al

Filing 29

ORDER Noting Need for Response to Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ WILLIAM E. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 14-13589 FIRST ALLIED SECURITIES, INC., Defendant. ______________________________________/ ORDER NOTING NEED FOR RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS This matter is before the court, on its own motion, relative to a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Defendant on or about March 3, 2015. The motion was followed soon thereafter by an “objection” filed by Plaintiff, proceeding pro se. The court observes, first, that an “objection” is not a response to a motion. Second, that the Local Rules provide for a period of twenty-one days to respond to a dispositive motion such as a motion to dismiss. E. D. Mich. LR 7.1e (1)(A), (B). And finally, that a colorable motion that stands with no opposition is very likely to be granted. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 17, 2015 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, March 17, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\Lisa's Folder\14-13589 Order Noting Need For Resonse to Motion to Dismiss.docx 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?