Pokladek v. Burton
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER denying 20 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL POKLADEK,
Petitioner,
Civil No. 2:14-CV-13602
HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
DEWAYNE BURTON,
Respondent.
___________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE MOTION TO AMEND THE PETITION FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO A PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR
Michael Pokladek filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
in which he challenged the revocation of his probation on his conviction of attempted fleeing and
eluding a police officer, third-degree, Mich. Comp. Laws 257.602a(3)(a). The Court denied as
moot the petition for a writ of habeas corpus because petitioner had been discharged from
custody. Pokladek v. Burton, No. 2:14-CV-13602, 2016 WL 393167 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 2, 2016).
Petitioner has filed a motion to amend his petition for writ of habeas corpus to a petition
for a writ of error. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED.
The Court assumes that petitioner is asking that his petition be amended to a petition for a
writ of error coram nobis. “[A] writ of error coram nobis is not the proper procedural vehicle to
contest a state court conviction in federal court.” Burkhart v. Ohio, 755 F. 2d 931 (Table); 1985
WL 12872, * 1 (6th Jan. 22, 1985)(citing Blake v. State of Florida, 395 F.2d 758 (5th Cir.
1968)). Thus, petitioner cannot use a petition for writ of coram nobis to obtain relief from his
conviction or probation violation.
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to amend the petition [Dkt. # 20] is
DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
s/Paul D. Borman
PAUL D. BORMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: February 23, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or
party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on February 23, 2016.
s/Deborah Tofil
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?