Pokladek v. Burton

Filing 21

OPINION AND ORDER denying 20 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL POKLADEK, Petitioner, Civil No. 2:14-CV-13602 HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE v. DEWAYNE BURTON, Respondent. ___________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE MOTION TO AMEND THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO A PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR Michael Pokladek filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he challenged the revocation of his probation on his conviction of attempted fleeing and eluding a police officer, third-degree, Mich. Comp. Laws 257.602a(3)(a). The Court denied as moot the petition for a writ of habeas corpus because petitioner had been discharged from custody. Pokladek v. Burton, No. 2:14-CV-13602, 2016 WL 393167 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 2, 2016). Petitioner has filed a motion to amend his petition for writ of habeas corpus to a petition for a writ of error. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED. The Court assumes that petitioner is asking that his petition be amended to a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. “[A] writ of error coram nobis is not the proper procedural vehicle to contest a state court conviction in federal court.” Burkhart v. Ohio, 755 F. 2d 931 (Table); 1985 WL 12872, * 1 (6th Jan. 22, 1985)(citing Blake v. State of Florida, 395 F.2d 758 (5th Cir. 1968)). Thus, petitioner cannot use a petition for writ of coram nobis to obtain relief from his conviction or probation violation. 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to amend the petition [Dkt. # 20] is DENIED. SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: February 23, 2016 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on February 23, 2016. s/Deborah Tofil Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?