Wong et al v. Detroit Entertainment et al

Filing 69

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 67 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JENNY WONG and
MICHAEL CHUNG
Plaintiffs,

Case No. 14-cv-13798
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman

v.
DETROIT ENTERTAINMENT,
LLC et al.
Defendants.
_________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF # 67)
On March 5, 2016, this Court entered an Order (ECF #66) denying without
prejudice Plaintiffs’ motion in limine (ECF #47). In their motion, Plaintiffs had
asked the Court to exclude certain testimony by Defendants that Plaintiffs claimed
was inadmissible. The Court ruled that the motion was premature and that it would
be more appropriate for Plaintiffs to raise their arguments following the Court's
ruling on Defendants' anticipated motions for summary judgment. (See ECF #66.)
Plaintiffs have now asked the Court to reconsider its ruling under Local Rule
7.1(h) (the “Motion for Reconsideration”). (See ECF #67.) The Court declines to
do so and DENIES the Motion for Reconsideration.

Plaintiffs have neither

persuaded the Court that it erred nor that Plaintiffs’ proposed timing for decision of
1

their motion is limine is superior to the Court’s. The Court notes that if Plaintiffs
have an objection to any of the evidence the Defendants offer in support of their
motions for summary judgment, Plaintiffs may assert those objections in their
responsive summary judgment briefing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: April 11, 2016
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on April 11, 2016, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
[phone]

2