Crisp v. Caruso et al

Filing 19

ORDER Adopting 18 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing the Case. Signed by District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III. (DPar)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MAURICE CRISP, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-cv-14132 v. HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III PATRICIA CARUSO, et al., Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (document no. 18) AND DISMISSING THE CASE Maurice Crisp is a prisoner currently in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections. He alleged in his lawsuit that while he was incarcerated at the St. Louis, Michigan Correctional Facility, he ingested contaminated water and as a result, developed numerous health complications. The Court referred the matter to a magistrate judge who permitted Crisp to cure the defects of his original complaint. Referral Order, ECF No. 10; Order 8–9, ECF No. 13. After Crisp amended his complaint, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation suggesting the Court dismiss the case as time-barred. See Report 6, ECF No. 18. De novo review of the magistrate judge's findings is only required if the parties "serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Pursuant to Civil Rule 72(b)(2), the parties were permitted to file objections to the Report within 14 days of service. No objections were filed, and therefore de novo review of the Report is not required. Having reviewed the Report's analysis, in light of the record, the Court finds that its conclusions are factually based and legally sound. Accordingly, it will adopt the Report's findings and dismiss the complaint with prejudice. ORDER WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (document no. 18) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. s/Stephen J. Murphy, III STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III United States District Judge Dated: November 8, 2016 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on November 8, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/David P. Parker Acting Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?