Michigan Laborers' Pension Fund v. Rite Way Fence, Inc. et al

Filing 92

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 90 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHIGAN LABORERS’ PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, Case No. 14-cv-14142 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. RITE WAY FENCE, INC. et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF #90) On January 17, 2017, Plaintiff the Michigan Laborers’ Pension Fund filed a motion for summary judgment on its claims against Defendants Rite Way Fence, Inc., Marx Contracting, Inc., H & H Rentals, LLC, and Eugene Zapczynski. (See ECF #75.) The Court held a hearing on the Fund’s motion on May 3, 2017. For the reasons explained on the record during the hearing, the Court granted the motion with respect to Defendants Rite Way. Marx, and H&H and denied the motion with respect to Defendant Zapczynski. (See ECF #89.) On May 17, 2017, the Fund filed a Motion for Reconsideration. (See ECF #90). The Fund’s reconsideration motion is DENIED because the Fund has not demonstrated a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled nor shown that 1    correcting such a defect (if it exists) would result in a different disposition of the case. See Local Rule 7.1(h). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 31, 2017 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on May 31, 2017, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (313) 234-5113 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?