Michigan Laborers' Pension Fund v. Rite Way Fence, Inc. et al
Filing
92
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 90 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHIGAN LABORERS’
PENSION FUND,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 14-cv-14142
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
RITE WAY FENCE, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF #90)
On January 17, 2017, Plaintiff the Michigan Laborers’ Pension Fund filed a
motion for summary judgment on its claims against Defendants Rite Way Fence,
Inc., Marx Contracting, Inc., H & H Rentals, LLC, and Eugene Zapczynski. (See
ECF #75.) The Court held a hearing on the Fund’s motion on May 3, 2017. For the
reasons explained on the record during the hearing, the Court granted the motion
with respect to Defendants Rite Way. Marx, and H&H and denied the motion with
respect to Defendant Zapczynski. (See ECF #89.)
On May 17, 2017, the Fund filed a Motion for Reconsideration. (See ECF
#90). The Fund’s reconsideration motion is DENIED because the Fund has not
demonstrated a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled nor shown that
1
correcting such a defect (if it exists) would result in a different disposition of the
case. See Local Rule 7.1(h).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 31, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on May 31, 2017, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(313) 234-5113
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?