Redd v. Vails et al

Filing 66

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 55 denying 52 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Parrish Redd Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (KDoa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PARRISH REDD, Plaintiff, Case No. 14-14340 Hon. Marianne O. Battani v. TERRANCE VAILS, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S THIRD EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint alleging copyright infringement in November 2014. The Court referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen for all pretrial proceedings. On April 13, 2015, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Third Emergency Motion for Default Judgment as to Chris Hugan and Marty Peters. In his Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the R&R needed to be filed “within fourteen (14) days of service” and that a party’s failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. (Doc. No. 55 at 3). No objection has been filed. The Court agree with the analysis and recommendation contained in the R&R. In light of the fact that Hugan and Peters have timely answered the complaint; the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: June 11, 2015 s/Marianne O. Battani MARIANNE O. BATTANI United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on June 11, 2015. s/ Kay Doaks Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?