Redd v. Vails et al
Filing
66
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 55 denying 52 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Parrish Redd Signed by District Judge Marianne O. Battani. (KDoa)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
PARRISH REDD,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 14-14340
Hon. Marianne O. Battani
v.
TERRANCE VAILS, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S THIRD EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint alleging copyright infringement in November
2014. The Court referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge R. Steven
Whalen for all pretrial proceedings. On April 13, 2015, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued
a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s
Third Emergency Motion for Default Judgment as to Chris Hugan and Marty Peters.
In his Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties
that objections to the R&R needed to be filed “within fourteen (14) days of service” and
that a party’s failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. (Doc. No.
55 at 3). No objection has been filed.
The Court agree with the analysis and recommendation contained in the R&R. In
light of the fact that Hugan and Peters have timely answered the complaint; the Court
ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: June 11, 2015
s/Marianne O. Battani
MARIANNE O. BATTANI
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their
respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on June 11, 2015.
s/ Kay Doaks
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?