Harris v. Tinsley et al
Filing
17
ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (SBur)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
YVONNE HARRIS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 14-14409
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub
v.
DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER,
ANDRE TINSLEY, and DEBRA
BRADFORD,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on
September 30, 2015
PRESENT:
Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
On August 4, 2015, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a report and
recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court (i) grant a motion to
dismiss filed by Defendants Detroit Medical Center, Andre Tinsley, and Debra
Bradford, and (ii) dismiss Plaintiff Yvonne Harris’s complaint in its entirety. No
objections have been filed to the R & R, and the deadline for doing so has passed.
Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ briefs in support of and opposition to
Defendants’ underlying motion, and the record as a whole, the Court concurs in
the analysis of the Magistrate Judge and adopts the R & R in its entirety.
Accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate
Judge’s August 4, 2015 Report and Recommendation (docket #16) is ADOPTED
as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated
in the R & R, that Defendants’ January 13, 2015 motion to dismiss (docket #9) is
GRANTED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: September 30, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on September 30, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary
mail.
s/Julie Owens
Case Manager, (313) 234-5135
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?