United States of America v. Odeh

Filing 2

ORDER granting 1 Motion for admission as Amicus Curiae in support of motion for reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (DPer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 14-mc-51593 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN vs. RASMIEH ODEH, Defendant. _____________________________/ ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [#1] Presently before the Court is the National Lawyers Guild’s (“NLJ”) Motion for Admission as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration, filed on November 20, 2014. This Court has broad discretion in determining whether to allow admission as an amicus to assist the court. Northern Sec. Co. v. United States, 191 U.S. 555 (1903); United States v. Michigan, 940 F.2d 143, 165 (6th Cir. 1991). Factors that warrant the granting of a motion to appear as an amicus include findings that “the proffered information of amicus is timely, useful, or otherwise necessary to the administration of justice.” United States v. Michigan, 940 F.2d at 165. In light of these factors, the Court concludes that the NLJ”s participation as an amicus is warranted. While the Government objects to the NLJ’s participation as an amicus on the theory that this Court lacks the authority to authorize such participation in a criminal action, the Court has been unable to locate any authority supporting the Government’s position. -1- Accordingly, the NLJ’s Motion for Admission as Amicus Curiae in Support of Motion for Reconsideration [#1] is GRANTED. The NLJ is directed to file its amicus brief in case number 1320772, United States v. Odeh, no later than December 3, 2014. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to CLOSE the instant action. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2014 /s/Gershwin A Drain___________ GERSHWIN A. DRAIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?