United States of America v. Odeh

Filing 7

Order Granting 1 Motion for Admission as Amicus Curiae in Support of Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (SCha)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 14-mc-51593 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN vs. RASMIEH ODEH, Defendant. _____________________________/ ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [#1] Presently before the Court is the National Lawyers Guild’s (“NLJ”) Motion for Admission as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration, filed on November 20, 2014. The Government has filed a Response to the NLJ’s Motion for Admission as Amicus Curiae and the NLJ has filed a Reply in support of its request to appear as Amicus Curiae in the instant matter. This Court has broad discretion in determining whether to allow admission as Amicus Curiae to assist the court. Northern Sec. Co. v. United States, 191 U.S. 555 (1903); United States v. Michigan, 940 F.2d 143, 165 (6th Cir. 1991). Upon review of the NLJ’s and the Government’s submissions, the Court finds that its original decision to grant the NLJ’s request to appear as Amicus Curiae is warranted under the circumstances. Accordingly, the NLJ’s Motion for Admission as Amicus Curiae in Support of Motion for -1- Reconsideration [#1] is GRANTED. The NLJ is directed to file its amicus brief in case number 1320772, United States v. Odeh, forthwith. SO ORDERED. s/Gershwin Drain GERSHWIN A. DRAIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: December 8, 2014 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, December 8, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Sakne Chami for Tanya Bankston Case Manager, (313) 234-5213 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?