ERICKSEN v. Doe #1 et al

Filing 37

ORDER denying 34 plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh (MBea)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DANIEL ERICKSEN,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 15-CV-10088
HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

v.
JOHN DOE #1, et al.,
Defendants.
/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 34)
Now before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order
denying his motion for a protective order to seal the record or to redact his name from all
court documents. The court “will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration that
merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable
implication.” E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(h)(3). To obtain reconsideration of a court order, “the
movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties and
other persons entitled to be heard on the motion have been misled but also show that
correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.” Id. Plaintiff’s motion
merely reiterates arguments already considered by this court and fails to show a palpable
defect by which the court and the parties have been misled. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion
for reconsideration (Doc. 34) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 22, 2015
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
September 22, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Marcia Beauchemin
Deputy Clerk