Jacobs v. Alam et al

Filing 275

ORDER striking documents 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 and 269 filed by Eduardo Jacobs. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (DPer)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
EDUARDO JACOBS,
Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 15-10516
HON. DENISE PAGE HOOD

v.
RAYMON ALAM, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS [#264] [#265] [#266] [#267]
[#268] [#269]
This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff Eduardo Jacob’s
(“Plaintiff”) various post-judgment motions. Following the jury’s verdict in favor
of Defendants Raymon Alam, Damon Kimbrough, and Dave Weinman, Plaintiff
filed six motions concerning alleged witness intimidation, juror tampering, and
other issues with the Court. The Court declines to discuss these motions on the
merits because they were filed by Plaintiff personally and not through his
attorneys. The Court finds that Plaintiff is not entitled to hybrid representation and
disregards Plaintiff’s pro se filings. Chasteen v. Jackson, No. 1:09-CV-413, 2012
WL 1564493, at *2 (S.D. Ohio May 3, 2012) The Court STRIKES Plaintiff’s pro
se filings. [ECF No. 264] [ECF No. 265] [ECF No. 266] [ECF No. 267] [ECF No.
268] [ECF No. 269]
1

For the reasons set forth above,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s post-judgment pro se Motions
[#264] [#265] [#266] [#267] [#268] [269] are DENIED and STRICKEN.

s/Denise Page Hood
DENISE PAGE HOOD
Chief United States District Judge

DATED: December 23, 2019

2