Pree v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Filing
21
ORDER Granting Defendant's 18 Motion to Compel More Specific Answers to First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, Answers to Supplemental Interrogatories, and Answer to Request for Information About Other Names Plaintiff Has Used and to Extend All Dates 90 Days. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
KAY PREE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 15-cv-10999
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
vs.
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,
Defendant.
__________________________________________________________________/
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION
TO COMPEL MORE SPECIFIC ANSWERS TO FIRST
INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS, ANSWERS TO SUPPLEMENTAL INTERROGATORIES,
AND ANSWER TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ABOUT OTHER
NAMES PLAINTIFF HAS USED AND TO EXTEND ALL DATES 90 DAYS
This matter having come on for hearing before this Honorable Court, and
this Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Compel More
Specific Answers to First Interrogatories and Requests for Production of
Documents, Answers to Supplemental Interrogatories, and Answer to Request for
Information About Other Names Plaintiff Has Used is granted as follows:
A.
Within 14 days of the Court’s Order, Plaintiff shall provide full,
complete, and more specific answers to Defendant’s First Set of
Interrogatories as to Interrogatory Nos. 3, 5, 6, and 7, and shall
provide full, complete, and specific answers to Defendant’s Request
for Production of Documents, specifying in the responses which
documents she is relying upon as to each Request and attaching any
and all documents responsive to the requests;
B.
Within 14 days of the Court’s Order, Plaintiff shall provide full,
complete, and specific answers to Defendant’s supplemental
interrogatories, including any documents upon which she relies; and
C.
Within 14 days of the Court’s Order, Plaintiff shall provide, in
writing, a list of any other names she has used at any time.
IT IF FURTHER ORDERED that all dates shall be extended for 90 days.
The Court will issue an amended Scheduling Order to reflect the extension of
dates.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: December 16, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on December 16, 2015, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(313) 234-5113
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?