Arndt v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 82

ORDER Extending Defendant's reply date., ( Defendant's Reply due by 8/31/2016)--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BRADLEY A. ARNDT,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:15-cv-11108
District Judge Paul D. Borman
Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
Defendant.
___________________________________/
ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S REPLY DATE TO AUGUST 31,
2016
Defendant filed its motion for summary judgment on May 2, 2016. (DE 75.)
The matter was set for a hearing before Judge Borman on August 31, 2016. (DE
76.) On May 19, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to extend his reply date until July
25, 2016. (DE 77.) I granted Plaintiff’s motion on May 20, 2016 and noted that
Defendant’s reply date would be similarly extended to August 9, 2016. (DE 80.)
Thereafter, Defendant filed a request for a conference regarding the extension,
explaining that counsel would be unavailable for most of August. (DE 81.)
The parties spoke with my law clerk on May 24, 2016, and agreed to extend
the reply date to August 31, 2016, as long as the hearing on the motion could
likewise be extended to a date in September. Accordingly, Defendant’s reply shall

be filed ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 31, 2016. As a result, Judge Borman will
issue a revised order re-setting the hearing date to a time that is convenient to the
Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 25, 2016

s/Anthony P. Patti
Anthony P. Patti
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record
on May 25, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.
s/ Michael Williams
Case Manager for the
Honorable Anthony P. Patti

2