Harris v. Bergh
Filing
8
ORDER denying 3 petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RODNEY O. HARRIS,
Case Number: 2:15-CV-11122
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
Petitioner,
v.
DAVID BERGH,
Respondent.
/
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Petitioner Rodney O. Harris, a state prisoner confined at the Thumb Correctional
Facility in Lapeer, Michigan, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254. Now before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel.
Petitioner has no absolute right to be represented by counsel on federal habeas
corpus review. See Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 65 F.3d 489, 492
(6th Cir. 1995); see also Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 293 (1992) (citing Pennsylvania
v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987)). “‘[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a
matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege and not a right.’” Childs v.
Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987). A habeas petitioner may obtain
representation at any stage of the case “[w]henever the United States magistrate or the
court determines that the interests of justice so require.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B).
The Court determines that the interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel
at this time.
-1-
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s “Motion for Appointment of Counsel”
[dkt. # 3].
SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 24, 2015
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
April 24, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on
Rodney Harris #227942, Thumb Correctional Facility,
3225 John Conley Drive, Lapeer, MI 48446.
s/Barbara Radke
Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?