Konica Minolta Business Solutions, U.S.A., Inc. v. Applied Imaging Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 101

ORDER denying 36 Motion to Amend/Correct Joint Plan. Signed by District Judge Victoria A. Roberts. (CPin)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, U.S.A., INC, Plaintiff, Case No. 15-11254 v. HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS LOWERY CORPORATION D/B/A APPLIED IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC., MATT AARON, ROB BELL, LINDA BOYLE, STEVE HURT, JON LIVINGSTON, RANDY MAGNER, and ANNA STEWART, Defendants. / ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND JOINT PLAN Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend Joint Plan (ECF No. 36). That Motion requests three forms of relief: (1) a Court order that Defendants comply with the terms of the approved Joint Plan; (2) elimination of the mediation requirement so that the parties proceed directly to phase two of discovery; and (3) reasonable attorneys fees associated with having to prepare and file the Motion. The Motion is DENIED as moot. Defendants’ alleged discovery violations are to be addressed in the context of Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 89), and subsequent discovery is to be outlined in detail by the parties in the Amended Rule 26(f) Joint Plan, which is due on July 28, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Notice (ECF No. 99). Because mediation already occurred, the request to remove the mediation requirement is denied as moot. Attorneys 1 fees will not be evaluated in the context of this motion; because the request for fees is tied to Defendants' alleged discovery violations, it will be considered in connection with the Amended Motion for Sanctions. IT IS ORDERED. S/Victoria A. Roberts Victoria A. Roberts United States District Judge Dated: July 15, 2016 The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on July 15, 2016. S/Carol A. Pinegar Deputy Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?