Alim Bey v. Sutherland et al
Filing
3
ORDER granting plaintiff's motion to proceed informa pauperis 2 , DISMISSING CASE and denying any appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
HAROUN ALIM BEY,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 15-CV-11398
HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH
v.
ANDREW SYLVESTER, ET AL.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT, AND DENYING ANY APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Pro se plaintiff, seeking to proceed in forma pauperis, alleges constitutional
violations, kidnaping, genocide, extortion, involuntary servitude, and other claims against
City of Taylor police officers, court clerk, court administrator, city attorney and others arising
out of his August 14, 2014 arrest.
Plaintiff previously tried to remove two criminal
misdemeanor offenses pending in the 23rd District Court in the City of Taylor to this court,
apparently involving the same charges underlying plaintiff’s complaint here, and Judge
Edmunds remanded the matter for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that plaintiff’s
claims were frivolous and incomprehensible. For the same reason, plaintiff’s complaint
here shall be dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim under the screening
process governing in forma pauperis complaints set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(ii).
Although federal courts hold the pro se complaint to a less stringent standard than
those drafted by attorneys, Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982)(per curiam);
-1-
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), under § 1915(e)(2)(B), a district court may
dismiss a complaint filed in forma pauperis before service on defendants if it is satisfied that
the action is frivolous, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks
monetary relief from defendants who are immune from such relief. A complaint may be
dismissed as frivolous “where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Nietzke
v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). To state a claim upon which relief may can be
granted, the complaint must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that
the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). The standard under Rule 8 “does
not require ‘detailed factual allegations,’ but it demands more than an unadorned, thedefendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)
(citation omitted).
The complaint is unintelligible and fails to state any viable claims against defendants.
Among other things, the complaint alleges that defendants violated the Treaty of Peace &
Friendship, the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of the Rights of the Child, the
Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and the Declaration of Human Rights, and
seeks enforcement of the Divine Constitution and By-Laws of the Moorish Science Temple
of America. These claims simply are not cognizable. In addition, many of the defendants
also would be entitled to immunity shielding them from prosecution of plaintiff’s claims. In
sum, plaintiff’s complaint is frivolous, fails to state a claim, and seeks monetary relief from
defendants who are immune from such relief.
Having considered plaintiff’s application to proceed without the prepayment of fees,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. (Doc.
1).
-2-
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED. Based on the
preceding order, this court certifies that any appeal from this decision would be frivolous,
not in good faith, and therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), may not be taken in
forma pauperis.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 27, 2015
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon the attorneys of
record and also on Haroun Alim Bey, 1125 Helen Street,
Inkster, MI 48141, on April 27, 2015, by electronic
and/or ordinary mail.
s/Barbara Radke
Deputy Clerk
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?