Edwards v. Prasad et al

Filing 62

ORDER Adopting 61 Report and Recommendation, Granting 40 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Prison Health Service, Anil Prasad, Granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Ghulam Dastgir Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIE EDWARDS # 193507, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-cv-11424 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge ANIL PRASAD, M.D., GHULAM DASTGIR, M.D., and PRISON HEALTH SERVICE, a/k/a CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Defendants. ________________________/ Patricia T. Morris United States Magistrate Judge ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE MORRIS’S OCTOBER 31, 2016 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 61), (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS CORIZON HEALTH, INC., AND DR. ANIL PRASAD’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 40), (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT GHULAM DASTGIR, MD’S JOINDER AND CONCURRENCE IN DEFENDANTS CORIZON HEALTH, INC. AND DR. ANIL PRASAD’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 46), AND (4) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE On October 31, 2016, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation to grant Defendants’ Corizon Health, Inc. And Dr. Anil Prasad’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40) and to grant Defendant Ghulam Dastgir, MD’s joinder in that Motion (ECF No. 46). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 40 and 46), and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: December 6, 2016 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on December 6, 2016. s/Deborah Tofil Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?