Conifer Insurance Company v. Continental Enterprises et al

Filing 20

PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CONIFER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 15-11650 CONTINENTAL ENTERPRISES, et al., Defendants. / PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING ORDER On August 4, 2015, the court conducted a telephone conference in the above-captioned matter. During the conference, the court questioned the existence of subject matter jurisdiction over this removed case. Counsel agree that the parties are not diverse, but disagree as to whether all Defendants are properly joined in this matter. Before commencing discovery or issuing a scheduling order, the court deems it prudent to first settle the preliminary issue of subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that by September 4, 2015 , Plaintiff Conifer Insurance Company shall a) submit a stipulation and proposed order that would i) eliminate non-diverse parties and clarify this court's jurisdiction, or ii) maintain the non-diverse parties and remand the case to state court OR, b) in the absence of a stipulated proposed order, file a motion to remand. If a motion is filed, briefing shall follow the deadlines imposed by the local rules. If a stipulation to remand is filed, the matter is concluded in this court; if a stipulation to eliminate the non-diverse parties is filed, the court will schedule a scheduling/status conference. S/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: August 11, 2015 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, August 11, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\15-11650.CONIFER.Briefing.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?